Good Health is Your Greatest Wealth……Virgil
However, I am not convinced that such a law necessarily violates the Free Exercise Clause. I hold, with the Court in Employment Division v. Smith (1990), that religious motives do not confer any immunity to otherwise permissible laws.
See all stories on this topic ยป
One of the arguments in the amicus brief I filed on Perich's behalf concerned the Court's leading free exercise precedent, Employment Division v. Smith. In Smith, the Court held that two Native American drug counselors who used peyote in a …
ACS Blog
This essay was part of a Cardozo symposium celebrating the twentieth anniversary of the landmark free exercise case, Employment Division v. Smith. I argue that full enforcement of Smith is essential to women's equality. …
Feminist Law Professors – http://www.feministlawprofessors.com/